+91 83685 88897 contact@samaantalawfirm.com Media Careers Search
Samaanta Law Firm crest Samaanta
Law Firm
Justice Through Equality

Banking & Recovery

NCLT and Insolvency Proceedings

A creditor owed one crore rupees or more by a company can seek to trigger the corporate insolvency resolution process, but the Code exists to rescue viable businesses, not simply to collect debts.

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 lets a financial creditor or an operational creditor apply to the National Company Law Tribunal to trigger the corporate insolvency resolution process against a defaulting company, provided the default meets the minimum threshold. Once admitted, control of the company passes to a resolution professional and a moratorium freezes most other proceedings against it, which changes the dynamics of any recovery strategy considerably.

We advise both financial and operational creditors on filing applications, and companies and their promoters on responding to them, including where the debt is genuinely disputed. We are candid that the Code is designed as a rescue and resolution mechanism, and that courts have been clear it should not be used as a substitute for ordinary debt recovery.

Scope

What we handle

01

Financial Creditor Applications

Filing an application under Section 7 for a financial creditor, such as a lender, based on evidence of default recorded with an information utility or otherwise.

02

Operational Creditor Demand Notices

Preparing the Section 8 demand notice an operational creditor must send before filing, and advising on how a company’s reply can defeat the application.

03

Default Threshold Assessment

Confirming the default meets the one crore rupee minimum threshold currently applicable for admitting an application under the Code.

04

Committee of Creditors Representation

Representing creditors before the committee of creditors during the resolution process, including on voting for or against a resolution plan.

05

Resolution Plan Advice

Advising stakeholders on the terms of a proposed resolution plan and the consequences of its approval or rejection.

06

Moratorium and Litigation Strategy

Advising on how the Section 14 moratorium affects pending suits, arbitration and other proceedings against a company once insolvency is admitted.

07

Alternatives to Insolvency Filing

Advice on when a civil suit, arbitration or SARFAESI action is a more realistic route to recovery than triggering insolvency.

In Detail

How insolvency proceedings begin, and why they are not a debt recovery tool

Who can trigger the process, and how

A financial creditor, typically a lender, can apply under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 directly to the National Company Law Tribunal on establishing a default, generally supported by records from an information utility or other clear evidence of the debt and default. An operational creditor, such as a supplier or service provider, must first send a demand notice under Section 8; only if the company does not pay, and does not raise a pre-existing dispute about the debt within the notice period, can the operational creditor then apply under Section 9. A genuine, pre-existing dispute about the debt is a real obstacle to admission for an operational creditor, and companies frequently rely on this to resist applications.

The minimum default threshold

An application generally cannot be filed unless the default is at least one crore rupees, a threshold that was raised some years ago from a much lower figure and applies to most corporate debtors. Smaller defaults, however genuine, fall outside this route entirely and must be pursued through a civil suit, arbitration or, where the debt is secured, SARFAESI or the Debts Recovery Tribunal instead.

Admission and the moratorium

Once the Tribunal admits an application, it appoints an interim resolution professional and, under Section 14, imposes a moratorium that suspends most suits, arbitration and recovery proceedings against the company, and prevents it from transferring or disposing of its assets. Control effectively passes to the resolution professional, and later to a committee of creditors formed from the company’s financial creditors, who decide whether to approve a resolution plan submitted by a prospective resolver within the timeline set by the Code, or move toward liquidation if no viable plan emerges.

Why the Code is not a recovery shortcut

Courts, including the Supreme Court, have repeatedly cautioned that the Code exists to rescue and resolve viable businesses in financial distress, not to serve as a pressure tactic or a substitute for ordinary debt recovery by a creditor who simply wants payment. An application filed principally to intimidate a solvent company into paying, rather than because the company is genuinely unable to pay, risks being dismissed and can expose the applicant to costs. For a creditor with a straightforward, undisputed claim against a company that is otherwise solvent, a civil suit, arbitration or a SARFAESI action, where security exists, is usually the more appropriate route.

Questions

Commonly asked

The default must generally be at least one crore rupees for an application under Section 7 or Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 to be admitted against a corporate debtor. This threshold was raised some years ago from a much lower figure, and defaults below it must be pursued through other routes such as a civil suit, arbitration, or SARFAESI where the debt is secured by a mortgage.

This is risky. Courts have repeatedly said the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 exists to resolve genuine financial distress, not to function as a debt-collection tool, and an application filed against an otherwise solvent company mainly to force payment can be dismissed, sometimes with costs against the applicant. Where the company disputes the debt genuinely, this risk is higher still, particularly for operational creditors.

Once an application is admitted, Section 14 imposes a moratorium that generally suspends pending suits, arbitration proceedings and execution against the company’s assets for the duration of the corporate insolvency resolution process. Claims must instead usually be filed with the resolution professional for consideration by the committee of creditors, and their recovery then depends on the terms of any resolution plan that is eventually approved, or on the liquidation process if no plan succeeds.

Consultation

Speak to a lawyer about your matter.

Tell us what has happened and what you need. We will tell you candidly whether you have a case, what it would take, and how the matter would be conducted.

Delhi & Gurugram · Monday to Saturday, 10:00–19:00 IST

Call Enquire
WhatsApp · Samaanta Law Firm